---
title: "A.C.T.I.O.N. Team"
type: "pdf"
year: "2008"
canonical: "/projects/771"
---

![img-0.jpeg](https://popdatasets.blob.core.windows.net/popdatasetmdimgs/08-37/img-0.jpeg)

City of Mesa Police Department
A.C.T.I.O.N Team
"All Coming Together in Our Neighborhood"

# Contact Details: 

# Table of Contents

- [Contact Details:](#contact-details)
  - [Denise Traves](#denise-traves)
- [CONTENTS](#contents)
- [City of Mesa, Arizona  A.C.T.I.O.N Team  "All Coming Together in Our Neighborhood"](#city-of-mesa-arizona-action-team-all-coming-together-in-our-neighborhood)
  - [Summary](#summary)
  - [Scanning:](#scanning)
- [Analysis:](#analysis)
  - [Response:](#response)
- [Assessment:](#assessment)
- [Falls for Service Comparison First Quarter 2007 to First Quarter 2008](#falls-for-service-comparison-first-quarter-2007-to-first-quarter-2008)
- [Calls for Service Resulting in Written Reports](#calls-for-service-resulting-in-written-reports)

## Denise Traves

Community Partnership Coordinator
Mesa Police Department
130 North Robson
Mesa, Arizona 85201
480.644 .2620
480.644 .2800 fax
denise.traves@cityofmesa.org

Mesa Police Department Mission Statement:

Your Police Department, dedicated to working with you,
fighting crime, defending human rights,
and protecting life and property,
to make our community safe for all.

# CONTENTS 

Summary ..... 3
Scanning ..... 3
Analysis ..... 4
Response to the problem ..... 4
Assessment ..... 5
Calls for service comparison $1^{\text {st }}$ quarter 2007, $1^{\text {st }}$ quarter 2008 ..... 6
Calls for Service resulting in written reports ..... 7
Uniform Crime Report Statistics 2006 to 2007 comparison. ..... 8

# City of Mesa, Arizona  A.C.T.I.O.N Team  "All Coming Together in Our Neighborhood" 

## Summary

The A.C.T.I.O.N Team was established as a long-term proactive partnership among many to help neighborhoods address blight and crime. The team employs innovative, varied and long-term strategies to achieve sustained success in selected project areas. Working along side the Mesa Police Department are the City of Mesa Prosecutor's office, City of Mesa staff, other City of Mesa divisions, community residents and private non-profit organizations. They work together to improve public safety and enhance the quality of life in the community. It is a grassroots approach to law enforcement and involves traditional and non-traditional initiatives by working within a community to prevent crime, thus reducing the number of arrests and prosecutions. There is direct interaction between city staff and community residents. The City of Mesa's Prosecutors office guides the process between itself, the Mesa Police department, other city departments, other governmental agencies and private organizations. These partnerships are critical components to the successful A.C.T.I.O.N Team program.

## Scanning:

Older neighborhoods in Mesa, Arizona show the wear and tear of their age. Changes in environment and demographics have also played some part in the decline of neighborhoods and has enhanced the negative effect of crime. Problems identified in the first project area started with a resident survey but also included input from the police officers, especially the officers working the area, other city departments like Code Compliance, Building Safety, the Fire Department, business community and many of the non-profits that serve the residents. The problems identified pertained more to low-level crime and quality of life issues such as prostitution, drug dealing, trespassing, graffiti, disorderly conduct, illegal dumping, and public consumption of alcohol and property crimes. Because there are many multi-family structures in the project area, a big focus of the team was to gain property owners compliance to the city codes, reduce blight on each property thus making it less inviting to commit crime in the area.

# Analysis: 

Resident surveys, community meetings and crime statistics were utilized and analyzed to determine the first area focused on by the team, which was the Reed Park neighborhood. It has had ongoing problems with quality of life issues and crime for many years. Changing demographics in the area have precipitated some changes to this already fragile neighborhood.

## Response:

Historically the city has not established multi-department teams to address these types of issues. Each department was responsible to resolve issues that involved only their department. Typical police actions helped to reduce activity in the short term but a longer-term approach involving those living in the targeted area and the other city departments, businesses and nonprofits was and is needed to sustain crime reduction efforts. The A.C.T.I.O.N team concept has changed that way of doing business.

Many traditional police enforcement alternatives to combating the problems in the Reed Park area have been utilized in the past years without much success. Without the community's help and the help of other city departments and outside agencies, the police fight a losing battle. Based on the survey of residents in the project area and the statistics gathered, a response plan was put in place to address the needs of the community. This included working with apartment communities that had high calls for service. Walkthroughs or CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) assessments were done on each multifamily property in the area. Property owners were required to make changes to their property in order to comply with city code. They also had to reduce the blight and crime component on the exterior of their multi-family facilities, and had to be current on all tax and licensing obligations. Changes were not merely suggestions. Property owners were held accountable to make the necessary changes in order to reduce or remove the likelihood of civil prosecution and nuisance abatement procedures. This has not always been the case.

The community was and remains active by attending regularly scheduled meetings to express any concerns and hear about the efforts being made in their community. Citizens are encouraged to remain active by calling the police or other departments for help as needed. Community cleanup events

have been held. One such project was planned by Mesa Police Department's Chief's Community Clergy Forum. There are nine different forums consisting of 15 to 25 community members on each forum. The individual forums are tasked with identifying a project for their group and the Clergy forum decided to perform community service in this project area. On March 18, 2008 a Spring Break Cleanup Day was held at a local elementary school. Approximately 60 youth of various ages and religions, along with several adults participated in the daylong event. The clean up took place from 9:00 am - 12:00 noon. The participants planted trees and shrubs and scrapped paint off of the sidewalks in order to repainted the same areas to make them brighter for the students. A community barbecue and concert was held in the afternoon. The concert targeted youth in the area and provided good positive messages for the young people to listen to.

While an event of this type may not seem like much to some, it was very important to the overall health of the community as the elementary school is a focal point for the families in this neighborhood. Providing such community service allows interaction with the police officers beyond traditional law enforcement and lets the residents of the community know that other people care about what takes place in the Reed Park area.

# Assessment: 

Using the A.C.T.I.O.N Team approach, we show a decline in the number of calls for service. Neighborhood participation was and continues to be key to the revitalization of the area. Involvement of both public and private partners is also necessary. By utilizing a faceted approach to the issues, the team along with the residents has made many positive changes in the target area. Community meetings held in the project area have continued to be well attended. This did not happen before the project. Residents were afraid to be involved. From January 2007 through November 2007, UCR data shows an $11.98 \%$ decrease in crime in the targeted area. Through the first quarter of 2008 there continues to be a decline in calls for service by $4.66 \%$.

# Falls for Service Comparison First Quarter 2007 to First Quarter 2008 

Harris to Gilbert and Dana to 6th Ave

| CFS BY CALL TYPE CONT. |  |  |  |
| :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: |
| CALL TYPE | 1st Qtr | 1st Qtr | \% |
|  | 2007 | 2008 | Change |
| SHOTS PARKD | 4 | 4 | 0.00\% |
| STOLEN VEHICLE | 5 | 5 | 0.00\% |
| STRONG ARM ROBBERY | 2 | 0 | $-100.00 \%$ |
| SUBJECT WIGUN | 2 | 3 | 50.00\% |
| SUBJECTS DISTURBING | 61 | 36 | $-25.46 \%$ |
| SUICIDE | 0 | 1 | NIC |
| SUSPENDED LICENSE | 33 | 29 | $-42.12 \%$ |
| SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY | 24 | 31 | 29.17\% |
| SUSPICIOUS PERSON | 18 | 20 | 11.11\% |
| SUSPICIOUS VEHICLE | 10 | 5 | $-50.00 \%$ |
| THEFT FROM BUSINESS | 4 | 6 | 50.00\% |
| THEFT FROM RESIDENCE | 5 | 4 | $-20.00 \%$ |
| THEFT FROM VEHICLE | 2 | 0 | $-100.00 \%$ |
| THREATS | 3 | 5 | 66.67\% |
| TRAFFIC CONTROL | 1 | 0 | $-100.00 \%$ |
| TRAFFIC HAZARD | 7 | 3 | $-57.14 \%$ |
| TRESPASS | 9 | 40 | 344.44\% |
| UNCODED CALL | 25 | 66 | 172.00\% |
| UNKNOWN TROUBLE | 34 | 13 | $-81.76 \%$ |
| UNKNOWN TROUBLE ALARM | 2 | 0 | $-100.00 \%$ |
| VEHICLE BURGLARY | 8 | 6 | $-25.00 \%$ |
| WARRANT ARREST | 31 | 43 | 36.71\% |
| Total | 656 | 634 | $-4.66 \%$ |

# Calls for Service Resulting in Written Reports

REED PARK OPPORTUNITY ZONE CALLS FOR SERVICE - DCT'S ONLY (REPORT WRITTEN) 2021 CALLS FOR SERVICE

|  CALL TYPE | Frequency  |
| --- | --- |
|  WARRANT ARREST | 95  |
|  UNCODEC CALL | 53  |
|  SUSPENDED LICENSE | 75  |
|  DRUGS | 50  |
|  STOLEN VEHICLE | 38  |
|  TRESPASS | 38  |
|  RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY | 32  |
|  FAMILY FISH* | 29  |
|  VEHICLE BURGLARY | 29  |
|  ORIGINAL DAMAGE | 28  |
|  DUI | 23  |
|  ACCIDENT NO INJURY | 21  |
|  THEFT FROM BUSINESS | 20  |
|  CIVIL MATTER | 15  |
|  FOUND PROPERTY | 14  |
|  H\&R ACCIDENT NO INJURY | 14  |
|  THEFT FROM RESIDENCE | 13  |
|  MISSING PERSON | 10  |
|  RECOVERED STOLEN VEHICLE | 10  |
|  SUBJECT'S DISTURBING | 10  |
|  ASSAULT | 9  |
|  CREDIT CARD FRAUD | 9  |
|  CHILD NEGLECT | 8  |
|  AGGRAVATED ASSAULT | 7  |
|  THEFT FROM VEHICLE | 6  |
|  ACCIDENT WINJURY | 5  |
|  ARMED ROBBERY | 5  |
|  COMMERCIAL BURGLARY | 5  |
|  JUVENILES DISTURBING | 5  |
|  SUBJECT WARNPE | 5  |
|  SUICIDE | 5  |
|  UNKNOWN TROUBLE | 5  |
|  CHECK WELFARE | 4  |

|  CALL TYPE | Frequency  |
| --- | --- |
|  WARRANT ARREST | 102  |
|  DRUGS | 74  |
|  UNCODEC CALL | 69  |
|  SUSPENDED LICENSE | 67  |
|  FAMILY FISH* | 36  |
|  ORIGINAL DAMAGE | 32  |
|  STOLEN VEHICLE | 23  |
|  VEHICLE BURGLARY | 23  |
|  SUBJECT'S DISTURBING | 19  |
|  TRESPASS | 18  |
|  THEFT FROM BUSINESS | 16  |
|  CREDIT CARD FRAUD | 16  |
|  MISSING PERSON | 15  |
|  RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY | 15  |
|  ACCIDENT NO INJURY | 12  |
|  CHILD NEGLECT | 12  |
|  CIVIL MATTER | 12  |
|  AGGRAVATED ASSAULT | 11  |
|  H\&R ACCIDENT NO INJURY | 11  |
|  ASSAULT | 10  |
|  DUI | 10  |
|  FOUND PROPERTY | 10  |
|  ACCIDENT WINJURY | 9  |
|  RECOVERED STOLEN VEHICLE | 9  |
|  THEFT FROM RESIDENCE | 9  |
|  CHECK WELFARE | 7  |
|  CHILD MILEST | 6  |
|  DOB BITE | 6  |
|  SUICIDE | 6  |
|  THEFT FROM VEHICLE | 6  |
|  FISH* | 5  |
|  JUVENILES DISTURBING | 5  |
|  STRONG ARM ROBBERY | 5  |

Uniform Crime Report Statistics 2006 to 2007 Comparison

REED PARK OPPORTUNITY ZONE

|  2006 UCR |  | Frequency  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Theft - Motor Vehicle Parts | 04 M | 42  |
|  Motor Vehicle Theft | 07 | 39  |
|  Theft | 06 | 36  |
|  Residential Burglary | 05R | 31  |
|  Aggravated Assault | 04 | 19  |
|  Aggravated Assault - DV | 04DV | 13  |
|  Robbery | 03 | 9  |
|  Commercial Burglary | 05C | 3  |
|  Total |  | 192  |

|  2007 UCR |  | Frequency  |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  Aggravated Assault | 04 | 42  |
|  Theft | 06 | 34  |
|  Motor Vehicle Parts | 06M | 28  |
|  Motor Vehicle Theft | 07 | 25  |
|  Residential Burglary | 05R | 14  |
|  Robbery | 03 | 12  |
|  Aggravated Assault - DV | 04DV | 6  |
|  Commercial Burglary | 05C | 4  |
|  Forcible Rape | 02 | 3  |
|  Homicide | 01 | 1  |
|  Total |  | 169  |