The core POP literature — problem-specific research syntheses and documented projects from agencies that already faced your problem.
The canonical POP library: problem-specific guides, the Herman Goldstein Award project archive, and the analysis primer Crime Analysis for Problem Solvers in 60 Small Steps.
Use it when: Starting any POP project — check whether your problem already has a guide before analyzing from scratch. This hub indexes its guides and conference projects.
The DOJ office that advances community policing. Publishes free practitioner manuals — including Implementing POP, the manual this directory is modeled on — and funds community-policing work nationwide.
Use it when: You need an implementation manual, training materials, or a federal grant program for community-policing work.
Organizations devoted to the idea that police practice should follow scientific evidence about what works.
Practitioner-led society translating policing research for working officers and analysts, with research briefs and an annual conference.
Use it when: You want research summaries written for practitioners rather than academics.
The UK counterpart — the original society, drawing on Britain's longer institutional history of embedding research in policing.
Use it when: Following UK developments, where much problem-oriented practice originates.
Academic center that maintains the Evidence-Based Policing Matrix — a visual map of every rigorous policing evaluation, organized by how focused and proactive the tactic is.
Use it when: Checking whether a proposed response has experimental support behind it.
Cambridge-affiliated research group behind targeting/testing/tracking methods and the Crime Harm Index.
Use it when: You want to weight problems by harm instead of raw incident counts — useful for prioritizing what to work on.
Rated registries of interventions — the fastest way to vet a candidate response before committing resources to it.
DOJ's rated registry of programs and practices, graded Effective, Promising, or No Effects based on evaluation quality.
Use it when: Vetting a specific named program or practice before adopting it.
Systematic-review summaries per intervention type, each rated on effect, mechanism, moderators, implementation, and cost.
Use it when: Comparing candidate responses quickly — the one-page summaries are built for exactly that.
Full systematic reviews of crime-and-justice interventions; the primary research behind many toolkit and clearinghouse ratings.
Use it when: You need the complete review behind a rating, not just the summary.
Primary data sources beyond what this hub already serves.
The national UCR/NIBRS source. This hub's agency trend and incident data derive from its bulk files.
Use it when: Verifying our numbers against the original, or pulling raw bulk extracts yourself.
LEMAS agency surveys, the National Crime Victimization Survey, and censuses of justice agencies.
Use it when: You need victimization data (crime that never gets reported to police) or staffing survey detail.
The archive where raw datasets from criminal-justice research live, including historical UCR and NIBRS series.
Use it when: You need study-level microdata or long historical series for analysis.
County-level performance measures across the whole justice system — prosecution, courts, corrections.
Use it when: Your problem crosses out of policing into the rest of the justice system.
Volunteer-built catalog of local police data sources across the US.
Use it when: Hunting for a local dataset this hub doesn't index yet.
The institutions that produce, publish, and professionalize policing research.
Membership organization of police executives; publisher of much of the POP canon and current management guidance.
Use it when: Leadership and organizational-practice questions — how other executives handled it.
Independent research organization (formerly the Police Foundation); published Sherman's original Evidence-Based Policing paper.
Use it when: Looking for applied research reports or a research partnership.
Training, certification, and standards for crime analysts.
Use it when: Building analysis capacity — the skill the POP literature identifies as the profession's weakest link.
The largest police professional association; maintains model policy documents and national award programs.
Use it when: You need a model policy as a starting point, or peer-recognition programs.
Problem-solving work often needs money the regular budget didn't anticipate. These are the main federal streams.
Hiring grants and Community Policing Development funding — the historical funder of POP practice and publications.
Use it when: Funding officers or a community-policing project, including problem-solving initiatives.
DOJ's main funding stream for state and local criminal-justice programs, including Byrne JAG and targeted initiative grants.
Use it when: Funding a response your budget didn't anticipate.
DOJ's research arm; funds research and evaluation partnerships.
Use it when: Partnering with a university to rigorously evaluate a response.
Format borrowed from the “Read More” boxes in Implementing POP (Scott & Kirby, COPS Office 2012). Know a resource that belongs here? Tell us. For searchable datasets and source links, use resource search.